The Sebring: A Car That Wrecked Chrysler
Where Do You Live?
The original Sebring entered into the automotive universe in 1995, for midsize coupes. Both the Sebring and the Mitsubishi Galant were build upon the same chassis. Available in LX or LXi trim, the Sebring coupe came with a 163-hp, 2/5-liter V6 and a standard four-speed automatic. When reviewers got ahold of the car, they quickly praised it for its looks and ample interior. The headroom in the Sebring was surprisingly roomy, given its steeply angled windshield. If you wanted to put the top down, then you certainly needed a windscreen.
In 2001 Chrysler introduced a new Sebring sedan and reworked coupes and convertibles powered by updated engines and transmissions. As before, the coupe shared a platform with Mitsubishi. The top-shelf option was a 3/0-liter V6 turning out a whopping 200-hp. At first, if you wanted a Sebring, your only choice was the LXi Coupe. A standard in convertibles (and LXi Sedans) was the impressive 2/7 liter, V6 thumping engine. The Sebring also offered a 2/4 liter engine. The Sebring was given high marks for its external looks, engine reliability, and consumer options.
The Sebring was prolific with offering different trim levels: the LX, LXi, GTC, TSi, and Touring trim models. By 2006, the Sebring was being produced no more. Going top-down still meant all of the turbulence in the Sebring, unless you got a windscreen.
This second evolution of the Sebring was good at the start, but competitors soon introduced more compelling models. When tested, the drive train was harsh, the ride bumpy, and build with inferior quality materials. Used car shopper wouldn’t do bad with the Sebring, although better options exist Despite the Sebring’s drawbacks, one will still be pleased with this car. The Sebring will always have a fond place in car driver’s hearts.
———————————–
When the author isn’t driving around her Sebring, she’s a fan of the Chrysler Sebring windscreen windblocker w ind deflector, the psychic reviews, and the Seattle HCG Diet and Weight Loss.
Leave a Reply